Type the dollar figure. A wrong answer tells you which way to go and how far off you were. Every rung reveals the citation and the date the figure last moved.
Rungs
Scorecard
SCORE 0 / 15
About Warrant · The daily judgment call
One realistic acquisition scenario a day. Classify it, name the controlling authority and pick the defensible contracting officer action, with six tries across all three. Every answer is cited. A new one every day, free, with no sign-in. Scores stay on your device.
About Threshold · Guess the number
Five federal acquisition dollar thresholds a day, three guesses each. A wrong guess tells you which way to go and how far off you were, and every rung shows the citation and the date the figure last moved. A new one every day, free, with no sign-in. Scores stay on your device.
About Clause & Effect · Name that clause
Five passages of real FAR clause text a day with the giveaway words blacked out. Name the clause, then name the section that prescribes it. A new one every day, free, with no sign-in. Scores stay on your device.
About Protest! · Sustain, deny, or dismiss
Three real GAO bid protest decisions a day. Read both sides, rule, stake your confidence, then pick what actually decided it. A new one every day, free, with no sign-in. Scores stay on your device.
About Option Year · Run the contract
Administer a contract one quarter a day. Your replies move four meters, some come back months later, and a reviewer grades the file at the end. A new one every day, free, with no sign-in. Scores stay on your device.
This Week
Issue of 9 Nov 2026 · 3 items
New decisions, rules and guidance a contracting officer should know about — with the line that actually matters, not just the link. Published Mondays, and emailed to anyone who .
A weakness for a project type your synopsis never asked for is an unstated criterion
GAO sustain
GAO sustained Michael Baker-International Stantec JV's protest of the Army Corps of Engineers' architect-engineer selection under synopsis W9128F25RA029, a Brooks Act / FAR part 36 competition for about five IDIQ contracts in the Northwestern Division, with task orders from $250,000 to $25 million against $200 million of shared capacity. Sixteen firms submitted; MBIS ranked tenth and the top seven went to interviews. The Corps had assigned MBIS a weakness under specialized experience because none of its ten example projects was a traditional design-bid-build new construction vertical facility — a requirement the synopsis's own list of project types never mentioned, and which the Corps had disclaimed in a question and answer stating "[t]here is not a preference" between delivery methods. GAO held the weakness "unreasonable, because it is inconsistent with the synopsis's stated evaluation factors," resolved doubt about prejudice in MBIS's favour given how little separated it from the seventh-ranked firm, and denied the rest — historic preservation, the Section G matrix, past performance and capacity. Decided 16 October 2026; posted by GAO 3 November 2026.
The two documents that sank this evaluation were the synopsis's list of project types and an answer to a vendor question, and both were written months before the board sat down. Before your board evaluates, read the synopsis bullet list and every Q&A answer back against the evaluation sheet, and strike any strength or weakness that turns on something neither document asked for — a delivery method, a facility type, a contract vehicle. An answer saying there is no preference is a commitment, and it binds the board as firmly as the synopsis does. The remedy here was a reevaluation and a new ranking of the most highly qualified firms, plus protest costs and attorneys' fees under 4 C.F.R. 21.8(d)(1), which is the cheapest possible loss and still cost the Corps its selection. Two more things worth taking from it. The firm that ranked tenth won because GAO resolved prejudice in its favour when the gap to seventh was one adjectival rating, so do not assume a lower-ranked protester cannot reach you. And the decision notes DoD's class deviation adopting the overhaul versions took effect 1 February 2026 while this synopsis predated it; nobody argued the difference mattered here, but on anything you issue now, cite the text your agency is actually running.
When the incumbent's schedule contract lapses, most of its protest lapses with it
GAO jurisdiction
GAO denied NDCHealth Corporation's protest, trading as RelayHealth, of a CMS solicitation for Medicare Part D transaction facilitator services — RFQ 75FCMC26Q0067, a fixed-price task order worth about $131.7 million over a base year and four options, competed among Federal Supply Schedule holders under SIN 54151S. RelayHealth was the incumbent, but its own FSS contract expired on 12 April 2026, and GAO held that because the RFQ was restricted to schedule holders it was "not eligible to compete under the RFQ" and so "not an interested party to raise these allegations" — which removed its challenges to how the two competing quotations were priced and evaluated. What survived was its attack on CMS's determination that the services are commercial, and that lost on deference: the determination "will not be disturbed by our Office unless it is shown to be unreasonable," and market research returning twelve responses, most pointing to schedule vehicles, made it reasonable. GAO also rejected the argument that a labour-rate, fixed-price structure departs from customary commercial practice, and found nothing in the GSAR requiring an order-level-materials analysis before the RFQ issued. GAO cited "the RFO as the controlling authority for this procurement," under RFO subpart 8.4. Decided 27 October 2026; posted by GAO 6 November 2026.
If you are moving a long-standing requirement onto the schedules, check whether your incumbent still holds a contract on the vehicle you are about to compete — and put the answer in the file, because it decides how much of a protest you have to defend. Where the incumbent's schedule contract has lapsed, its standing to attack the competitive range, the awardee's pricing or the evaluation goes with it, and you are left defending only the decisions it can still reach: the commerciality determination, the solicitation's structure, the scope of the vehicle. That is the other half of the lesson, and it is the half that is yours to earn in advance. The commerciality determination held here because there was market research in the file — an RFI, twelve responses, most of them naming schedule vehicles — and a stated analogue in the commercial market that CMS could modify to the Part D requirement. Deference is not automatic; it attaches to a documented determination. Do the research before you decide the requirement is commercial, not after the protest arrives, and name in the determination which commercial market you are reasoning from.
Consolidation survives a protest on the contemporaneous record, not on the declaration you write afterwards
GAO scope
GAO denied Priority 1 Air Rescue Operations (Arizona), LP's pre-award protest of a Coast Guard small business set-aside, RFP 70Z02326R93150001, issued 18 June 2026 under Revolutionary FAR Overhaul parts 12 and 15 for three training devices — an MH-60T level 7 flight training device, a hoist training simulator and a deployable hoist training simulator — all required to be interoperable and to run synchronised with latency no greater than 50 milliseconds. The protester argued that combining the three into one solicitation unduly restricted competition. GAO applied the Competition in Contracting Act standard, 41 U.S.C. 3306(a)(2), under which a solicitation may "contain restrictive provisions only to the extent necessary to satisfy the procuring agency's needs," and found the Coast Guard had shown a reasonable need for pilots and flight mechanics to train together in one synchronised environment and for a single contractor to integrate the pieces. A footnote notes that CICA's reach against total-package or bundled procurements is "broader" than the Small Business Act's bundling restrictions, so the protester's bundling framework was not the test. GAO accepted the air training centre commanding officer's declaration, written during the protest, because it "simply fill[ed] in previously unrecorded details" consistent with the working group reports, the approval memorandum and the RFP's own stated reasons; a brand-name allegation about the hoist simulator was dismissed as academic after the Coast Guard amended the RFP. Decided 29 October 2026; posted by GAO 3 November 2026.
Consolidating requirements is defensible and this agency won — but read what carried it. The declaration was credited only because it matched documents that already existed in the file: a working group's reports, an approval memorandum up the chain and the RFP's own statement of why the devices had to interoperate. If you are combining requirements that the market sells separately, write that reasoning down while you are deciding, not when the protest lands, and be specific about the technical reason one contractor has to own the integration — here, a 50-millisecond synchronisation tolerance across three devices. Note also which test you are being graded against. On a set-aside, a protester will often frame the complaint as bundling under the Small Business Act, but at GAO the controlling standard is CICA's, and it is broader: it is not enough that a consolidation clears the bundling rules if the record does not show the restriction is necessary to meet the need. And if you amend to fix a brand-name or specification problem after a protest is filed, GAO will dismiss that ground as academic — which is the cheapest correction available to you in the whole process.
Things that are still wrong in a lot of desk guides, training decks and bookmark bars. These stay up until they stop being wrong.
Oct 1 2025
The October 2025 figures are still being miscited
Thresholds
Micro-purchase threshold $15,000. Simplified acquisition threshold $350,000. FAR 13.5 commercial test program ceiling $9M. TINA $2.5M. FAR 16.505 enhanced competition $7.5M, with fair-opportunity exception approvals at $900K, $20M and $90M.
Desk guides quoting a $250,000 SAT are still in circulation a year later. A buy between $250,000 and $350,000 that gets routed into FAR Part 15 is the most common unforced error we see.
Trade agreement thresholds reset in March 2026, and construction went down
Thresholds
FAR 25.402 thresholds reset on their own two-year cycle, separate from the October inflation adjustment (FAR Case 2025-007, FAC 2026-01). Effective 13 March 2026: WTO GPA supplies and services $174,000; construction $6,683,000, down from $6,708,000.
A construction acquisition estimated between $6,683,000 and $6,708,000 is now covered when it was not last year. If you set a Buy American determination on the old figure, re-check it.
RFO is in rulemaking, not in effect — check which text your agency is on
FAR overhaul
Eight of the twelve proposed rules have published: four on 23 June 2026, comments closed in July, and four more on 18 September 2026, comments closed 19 October 2026. Model deviation text was conformed to the codified FAR in March 2026. The model text is not self-executing: it reaches an agency only when that agency issues its own class deviation under FAR 1.404, and once one is in force the agency follows the deviation instead of the codified FAR for the parts it covers. The codified FAR stays the government-wide baseline, and it is what still governs every agency and every part not covered by a deviation.
"The FAR says" is no longer a complete answer. Paragraph lettering and some prescriptions differ between the codified FAR and the RFO deviation text, and for an agency that has adopted a deviation the deviation is the operative text. Confirm which one your agency is running, part by part, before you cite a subparagraph in a J&A or a determination.
FAR Case 2023-006 would restructure Subpart 9.5 around defined conflict categories and a standard solicitation provision. The proposed rule published 15 January 2025 and is not final as of this date. FAR part 9 is now in the overhaul rulemaking as well — RFO FAR Case 2026-011, published 18 September 2026, comments closed 19 October 2026 — so there are two pending rewrites of Subpart 9.5 to keep apart from the text in force.
Current Subpart 9.5 governs. Do not build a mitigation plan or a solicitation provision on the proposed framework — including the parts of it industry counsel are already citing in responses.
Three DoD figures moved by statute that the FAR still prints at the old numbers
Thresholds
Section 1804 of the FY2026 NDAA (Pub. L. 119-60, enacted 18 December 2025) amended title 10 directly. The statutory justification-and-approval tiers in 10 U.S.C. 3204(e)(1) were raised from $500,000 / $10 million / $75 million to $10 million / $100 million / $500 million. The DoD certified cost or pricing data threshold in 10 U.S.C. 3702(a)(1) was raised from $2 million to $10 million for prime contracts entered into after 30 June 2026. Section 885 of the FY2025 NDAA had already raised the DoD, NASA and Coast Guard task order protest threshold in 10 U.S.C. 3406(f)(1)(B) from $25 million to $35 million. FAR 6.304, FAR 15.403-4 and FAR 16.505(a)(10) still show the earlier figures.
Where Congress has moved a figure and the FAR has not been conformed, a tribunal applies the statute, so the FAR paragraph you are about to cite may be the wrong number. FAR 6.304's inflation-adjusted approval ceilings are not the statutory tiers and should not be described as them; DoD is implementing the data threshold by class deviation, so read the deviation before deciding what to require; and a $30 million DoD task order that FAR 16.505(a)(10) says GAO cannot hear is one GAO will hear.
“You cannot protest an other transaction” is no longer a safe thing to tell anyone
Courts
In Blue Water Autonomy, Inc. v. United States, Nos. 26-936, 26-944, Judge Hadji denied the government's motion to dismiss a consolidated protest by two offerors cut at Phase 1 of the Navy's competition for Medium Unmanned Surface Vessel prototypes under its other transaction authority, 10 U.S.C. 4022. The court held that 28 U.S.C. 1491(b)(1) reaches the competition because it is “in connection with” the Navy's procurement of the vessels: the Navy had identified the need in its 30-year Shipbuilding Plan with an appropriation behind it, then ran the solicitation as what it called “a direct, competitive down-select” in which only successful prototype offerors can reach production. The court was careful about what it did not hold — an OT is still not a procurement contract, and an OT whose principal purpose is funding research or seeding a commercial market stays outside the statute. It also expressly declined to follow Telesto Group, LLC v. United States, 176 Fed. Cl. 711 (2025), which had found an “effective jurisdictional blackout” over the prototyping phase until the agency decides to buy. Filed 29 October 2026; posted to GPO 4 November 2026, after the 2 November issue had closed. A merits opinion is to follow, and this is one trial judge, not the Federal Circuit, which has never decided the question.
A good deal of OT training and more than one agency playbook still says, flatly, that an OT prototype competition cannot be protested anywhere. That was always too strong, and after Blue Water it is wrong in the forum that matters. Two practical consequences. If you are structuring a prototype OT as a down-select where only the winners can reach production, assume a disappointed offeror can reach the Court of Federal Claims, and run the competition so the record will survive that — the review on offer is narrow, reaching the agency's compliance with section 4022's own conditions, including the requirement at 4022(b)(2) to use competitive procedures to the maximum extent practicable, and the terms of your own solicitation. Write the evaluation criteria so you can show you followed them. Second, note what the court read as the tell: the Navy's own words. “A direct, competitive down-select,” “a direct path to production,” and the statement that it was no longer interested in paying industry to build prototypes are what tied the OT to a procurement. Marketing language in an announcement is evidence of the agency's purpose. OTs remain exempt from the FAR and CICA, and nothing here changes that.
Jessica Tillipman on procurement at the intersection of law, policy and practice. The most serious show on FAR reform right now, and it is still publishing.
A former Navy and SOCOM acquisition executive interviewing the people building the industrial base. The closest you get to hearing how senior acquisition leadership actually reasons, rather than what it says in a memo.
Narrow and current on UAS, autonomy and the scaling problem. Worth the time if you are buying drones — and increasingly you are, whether or not your position description says so.
Small-business GovCon from the industry side, including size standards and protest practice. Publishes in bursts rather than to a schedule, so check the date.
Community
Where practitioners argue with each other in public, which is underrated.
Enter the estimated value of a buy and describe it. Dollar check returns the procedure lane, every threshold the buy crosses with the rule it triggers, the next lines above it, the justification approver and the socioeconomic sole-source ceilings, each with its citation.
GAO, CICA stay and agency-level protest deadlines worked out from the award, debriefing and DoD follow-up dates, with federal holidays and weekend roll-forward counted the way 4 CFR 21.0(d) counts them.
Enter the fiscal year of the funds and see where a fixed-period appropriation sits in its life cycle: available for new obligations, expired, or closed.
The point of total assumption for a fixed-price incentive (firm target) contract under FAR 16.403-1, from the targets, the ceiling price and the share line.
The current figure, the one before it, the date it moved and the citation.
Privacy
Updated 11 November 2026
Short version: we don't know who you are. If you subscribe and confirm from your inbox, we keep your email address. We also count plays: which games get finished and which answers people miss. Those counts carry no name, no IP address, no device ID and nothing you type into a tool. You can switch counting off below.
What we collect
If you subscribe: your email address, the date you subscribed, the two-letter country code our host reports for your connection, whether you confirmed the address and when, and which issues have been sent to it — the date of each issue and the time it went out. That last part is bookkeeping: an issue goes out in batches, and it is what lets a send that stops halfway be picked up again without mailing you a second copy. That's the whole record. We don't ask for your name or your agency, and there's no field to give them to us.
If you set an alert: some pages (a FAR threshold, a FAR part in the overhaul) offer an email when that page's figure or status changes. If you ask for one and confirm it from your inbox, we keep your email address, which page you asked to be told about, the date you asked and when you confirmed, and, after a change, the fact that the alert about it was sent to you, so a send that stops halfway does not tell you twice. An alert is not the weekly email: setting one does not put you on the list, and the two are kept and removed separately. We do not use what you chose to watch for anything except sending that alert.
Anonymous usage counts: short records your browser sends to this site when you use it. They're counts, not a history of you.
Arrival. Whether you came from a share link, a search engine or another site. For another site, we keep its domain name only.
Section. Which part of the site you opened, such as This Week, Library, Tools, the FAR overhaul tracker, the FAR thresholds page or a game.
Play. The game, the day's puzzle, your score out of 100, and the category of a wrong answer (for example "wrong authority").
Return visits. Two coarse numbers your browser works out for itself: how long ago this device first finished a game (same day, within a week, within a month, or longer) and how many of the last seven days it played.
Share. That a share button was used. Not where the result went.
Tools. Which tool was used and its mode, such as "protest clock, after award". Never the dollar value, dates or anything else you enter. The same goes for search: what you type stays in your browser.
Links. Which Library, This Week, tracker or thresholds-page link was followed.
Arcade. In the Coin-Op arcade (/arcade): that the page was opened, where the visit came from (as for Arrival above, plus whether it was opened from your Home Screen), the same two return-visit numbers counted from this device's first arcade visit, which game was played with its level and whether it was one or two players, and how many runs it took. Not your scores, and never the player names you type in.
Each record is stored with the time we received it. We don't store IP addresses, browser or device details, or any identifier that links one record to another or to you. We can see that a Warrant puzzle was finished; we can't see who finished it.
Confirming the address
Typing an address into the box does not put it on the list. We email that address a link, and only following the link subscribes it. Until then the address is marked unconfirmed and is sent nothing but that one note, which is what stops somebody signing up an inbox that isn't theirs. Unconfirmed addresses receive no issues, and unconfirmed sign-ups are deleted after 30 days.
Keeping the form from being abused
So the subscribe box can't be pointed at someone's inbox, we count recent attempts against a one-way hash of the address and of the connecting IP. Those counters hold no readable address and no IP, aren't joined to the subscriber list, and are deleted once their window (an hour, or a day) has passed.
What we don't collect
No cookies set by this site. No advertising or tracking pixels. No third-party analytics. No fingerprinting. No session recording.
Switching counting off
Checking…
The switch applies to this browser on this device, and it stays off until you turn it back on or clear site data. If your browser sends Global Privacy Control or Do Not Track, nothing is counted in the first place. With JavaScript off, nothing is counted and nothing is stored.
What stays on your device
All five games keep your progress, streaks, daily scores and career rank in your browser's local storage, along with your theme and the last tab you opened. The arcade keeps its best scores, levels, sound setting and your players' names there too. With counting on, the site and the arcade each also keep the two return-visit numbers above. That data never leaves your device except as those counts, and we can't see it. Clearing your browser storage erases it permanently, including your streaks. There's no server copy to restore from.
A Tools link you share carries your inputs in the part of the address after the #. Browsers don't send that part to any server, ours included, but whoever you send the link to can read it.
Who else is involved
The site is served by Cloudflare. Cloudflare hosts the page, runs the subscribe and counting endpoints, stores the subscriber list and the usage counts, and delivers our email (the confirmation note and the weekly issue), so it sees your address when it sends to you. Like any host, it keeps its own standard network logs for security and abuse prevention. It processes this data on our behalf and is the only third party with access to it. Fonts are served from this site. Loading a page makes no request to Google or to any other outside service.
What we do with it
We use your email address to send you the weekly issue, and nothing else. We use the counts to decide what to build, what to fix and which items are confusing. If one scenario trips up far more people than the rest, it gets checked first. We don't sell, rent, share or trade either, and we don't use them for advertising.
How long we keep it
Usage counts are deleted after 400 days. Email addresses are kept until you unsubscribe or ask us to remove yours. An alert is kept until you stop it; an alert you asked for but never confirmed is deleted after 30 days.
Getting off the list, or deleting your record
Every issue carries an unsubscribe link, and your mail client's own unsubscribe button works too. Either takes one press: no reply, no sign-in, and nobody asking why. You can also write to hello@fullandopen.com to be removed, or to ask what we hold about you. Removal deletes the row and the note of which issues went to you; we don't keep a suppression list of people who left. Usage counts can't be tied to you, so there's nothing in them to look up or delete.
Every alert email carries two links: one stops that alert, the other stops every alert for your address. Either takes one press and deletes the record, including the note of which alerts were sent to you. Stopping an alert does not take you off the weekly list, and leaving the list does not stop an alert; each has its own link.
Government email addresses
Many subscribers will use a government address. Check your agency's rules on subscribing to outside publications with your work email before you do. That's your call to make, not ours, and we have no way to tell whether an address is permitted.
Children
This site is for acquisition professionals and isn't directed at children under 13. We don't knowingly collect anything from them.
Changes
When this policy changes, the date above changes with it, and we say what changed. We won't retroactively apply a worse policy to data collected under a better one.
11 November 2026: added alerts. A FAR threshold page and a FAR part page can now email you when that figure or status changes. This is new collection for people who ask for one: the email address, which page, and the dates described under "If you set an alert" above. Nothing changes for anyone who does not ask, and nothing changes about the weekly list.
10 November 2026: added site search (/search). It runs entirely in your browser against a list of pages this site publishes: what you type is never sent to us or to anyone else, and is not counted. Opening the search page is counted like any other section.
9 November 2026: the site gained reference pages: past issues of This Week (/this-week/archive), a page for each FAR threshold and each FAR part in the overhaul, FAR clauses (/far-clauses) and GAO decisions (/gao-decisions). They send the same anonymous counts as the rest of the site, and the counting switch in this panel turns them off there too. Nothing new is collected.
30 September 2026: the Coin-Op arcade (/arcade) now sends anonymous counts of visits and games played, listed under Arcade above. The counting switch in this panel turns them off there too.
29 September 2026: the FAR overhaul tracker (/far-overhaul) and the FAR thresholds page (/far-thresholds) send the same anonymous counts as the rest of the site, and the counting switch in this panel turns them off there too. Nothing new is collected.
16 September 2026: the weekly issue now goes out by email, from the same Cloudflare mailer that sends the confirmation note. Alongside your address we now keep a note of which issues have been sent to it and when, so a send that stops partway through the list can be finished without mailing anyone twice. Unsubscribing deletes that note along with the rest of your record.
15 September 2026: added anonymous usage counts and the switch to turn them off. Subscribing now takes a confirmation from your inbox, and our email is delivered by Cloudflare. Fonts are now served from this site instead of Google Fonts.
Terms
Updated 15 September 2026
Short version: this is an independent site written by practitioners for practitioners. It's educational material, not legal advice and not official guidance, and you're responsible for checking the controlling text before you act.
What this site is
Full and Open is independent. It isn't affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or speaking for the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, the Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, GAO, or any other agency or government entity. It isn't affiliated with any contractor, or with any employer of the people who write it, and nothing here speaks for them. Nothing here is official guidance or has been approved by anyone in a position to approve it.
Not legal advice
Reading this site doesn't create an attorney-client relationship, a consulting relationship, or any other professional relationship. Nothing here replaces your own reading of the FAR, your agency supplement, your class deviations, your contracting officer's warrant, or advice from your own counsel. If a decision matters, take it to someone accountable for it.
Accuracy, and its limits
Every game answer, threshold and This Week item carries a pinpoint citation and an "as of" date. Those dates matter: thresholds move, clause numbering moves, and the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul is changing paragraph lettering while agencies run class deviations against different text. A citation that was right in September may not be right by March. Verify against the current controlling text before you rely on anything here.
The game content is reviewed by its author, and each item is marked for a second review by an experienced practitioner. That second pass isn't done yet — the reviewer view opens with the running count and marks every record, so you can see exactly how much of this has had a second read. Where a statute has moved and the codified FAR hasn't caught up, the build refuses content that gives the superseded figure as the current answer. We publish corrections rather than quietly editing; when something was wrong, the record says so.
The tools
The dollar check, the protest clock, the colors-of-money check and the PTA calculator apply published rules and standard arithmetic to what you enter. They're aids to judgment, not determinations. They can't account for facts you don't enter, a class deviation or agency supplement they don't cover, the terms of your solicitation or contract, or a change since they were last verified. Where a statute has moved ahead of the regulation, they flag it. The absence of a flag doesn't mean nothing has changed.
Deadlines are yours. GAO, the boards, the courts and agencies decide timeliness on your facts under their own rules, not ours. Treat a computed date as a prompt to confirm the date, not a guarantee, and file early if you can.
Using the site
Read it, play it, share it, quote it with attribution, and use it to train your people. Don't scrape it wholesale, republish the content as your own, sell it, or present it as official material. Don't try to break the subscribe or counting endpoints, send them fake or automated traffic, or use the subscribe form for addresses that aren't yours.
Content and citations
Quoted regulatory and statutory text is a work of the United States Government and is in the public domain. The scenarios, explanations, commentary and the way things are organized here are ours. Outbound links go to sites we don't control and aren't responsible for, and a link isn't an endorsement.
No warranty
The site is provided as is, without warranties of any kind. We don't warrant that it's complete, current or error-free. To the fullest extent the law allows, we're not liable for any loss arising from your use of it. That includes a decision you made, a determination you signed, a deadline you missed, or a file you built on something you read here. That responsibility stays with you, which is where it sits in your day job.
Changes and contact
These terms can change, and the date above will change with them. Questions, corrections and dead links: hello@fullandopen.com. Corrections are the most useful mail we get.
This Week, in your inbox every Monday.
One email a week: what changed, what got decided, and what it means for the file on your desk. Written by practitioners, for the people who run the competitions.
Mondays · no vendor pitches · one-press unsubscribe
We email you a link to confirm the address is yours. It is used for the weekly issue and nothing else.